Are we talking about Optics for HFT ?
Hi all
Well I swear by the Hawke Vantage Sf 3-12-44 . I have used loads of scopes and they have all been ok but when I got this , it was like another level. I just love it . The Half Mil dots work so so well for HFT , I love it zeroed at 40 yards , just works so so well. If you have not seen one I suggest you have a look and see what they are like . I just love mine .
Check it out and see
LAity
Well I swear by the Hawke Vantage Sf 3-12-44 . I have used loads of scopes and they have all been ok but when I got this , it was like another level. I just love it . The Half Mil dots work so so well for HFT , I love it zeroed at 40 yards , just works so so well. If you have not seen one I suggest you have a look and see what they are like . I just love mine .
Check it out and see
LAity
-
- Příspěvky:5
- Registrován:ned 23. říj 2016 19:38:40
Re: Are we talking about Optics for HFT ?
There speaks a true hawke ambassador ![Mrknutí ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
![Mrknutí ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Re: Are we talking about Optics for HFT ?
Had vantage 4-12x40. Now using sidewinder 10x42. Like day and night. Sidewinders reticle is thin, vantages thick. Maybe in SF version reticle is thinner.
Re: Are we talking about Optics for HFT ?
I swear on 4,5-14x32 Burris Timberline.
Timberline is very compact and robust scope with minimal paralax error due small objective diameter and long eye relief. What I miss is better reticle than ballistic plex.
Airguns are changing but I still have the same piece of optics ...
2012
![Obrázek](http://www.fieldtarget.cz/images/stories/Foto/2012-08-26_HFT_Polsko/DSCN3990.JPG)
2015
![Obrázek](http://www.fieldtarget.cz/images/stories/Foto_2015/2015-02-08_Zakrzow/DSCN8751.JPG)
2016
![Obrázek](http://www.fieldtarget.cz/images/stories/Foto_2016/2016-08-21_Duszniki/DSCN4858.JPG)
![Mrknutí ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Timberline is very compact and robust scope with minimal paralax error due small objective diameter and long eye relief. What I miss is better reticle than ballistic plex.
Airguns are changing but I still have the same piece of optics ...
![Velmi šťastný :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
2012
2015
2016
Jakub Vicher, CAFTA
Re: Are we talking about Optics for HFT ?
I have not seen that one before Jakub, I would like to look through it . I do swear by the scope I have though , cheap , brilliant and easy to use . What more do you want
??
LAity
![Velmi šťastný :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
LAity
Re: Are we talking about Optics for HFT ?
I'm Vantage 4-12x40 AO Mil Dot, but I'm not satisfied.
Cross has a thick and lacks half-mildot.
Cross has a thick and lacks half-mildot.
-
- Příspěvky:5
- Registrován:ned 23. říj 2016 19:38:40
Re: Are we talking about Optics for HFT ?
Try the Hawke Airmax 4-12x40 AO very good HFT scope imo. I am liking it so far ![Úsměv :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
![Úsměv :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Re: Are we talking about Optics for HFT ?
Leupold vari x iii 2.5-10x40 . mildot ret is my preferred...........
Re: Are we talking about Optics for HFT ?
I'm using either a 2.5-10x24 Nightforce or 3-9x32 Clearidge at the minute. Both great optics!
Re: Are we talking about Optics for HFT ?
I use the 10 x 42 Sidewinder also on my GoldStar for HFT its a great scope. I've a 4-16 x 50 Vantage on another rifle and for the cash they are a great bit of kit!edmundasl píše:Had vantage 4-12x40. Now using sidewinder 10x42. Like day and night. Sidewinders reticle is thin, vantages thick. Maybe in SF version reticle is thinner.